SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
e360InsightMOTION to VacateThis is a motion to vacate the dismissal and force Linhardt and e360 to pay Susan Wilson's attorneys' fees. This motion was denied on June 18, 2008.
ORDER Granting Motion to DismissMINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall: Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal 47 is granted. Case is dismissed with prejudice. All pending deadlines and hearings are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (kw, ) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
Ruling on Motion to DismissIt's not going to be a good day for you anytime that a ruling starts off by calling your request "largely misguided". MOTION to DismissI guess the money for all of this litigation is starting to run low. e360 is cutting this lawsuit loose with a voluntary motion to dismiss WITH PREJUDICE (meaning that they cannot refile the case later if they change their minds). Reply to Response to MOTION to DismissWell, we will have to wait an see what happens in this case. e360 has finally managed to bring some colorable caselaw to bear on its case. Most of it is persuasive (meaning "non-binding" rather than "Oh man!
Reply to Response to MOTION to DismissHere is Linhardt's amazing response to John Ferron's response to Linhardt's motion to dismiss. Among other amazing tidbits to be found in this document is a disavowal of his connection to BargainDepot.net (Reply at 1-2, Linhardt Affidavit at paragraph 4). Unless he's got an evil twin, then he's got problems. Possibly with perjury.
Response to MOTION to DismissThis is more or less of a document dump. I don't have the time currently to OCR these documents, but they need public disclosure.
RESPONSE to Motion to DismissIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CORPORATION, v. E360INSIGHT, LLC,
Minute Entry DENYING Motion to ReconsiderRaise your hand if you're shocked by this one, but the Judge has denied e360Insight's Motion to Reconsider. ========================
MOTION to Reconsider05/01/2008 - 10:15 America/Chicago When a federal district court judge says that a bunch of people might call you a spammer, then your honor must be defended! And so e360Insight, LLC, is asking the judge to pretty please take that back and let them have a case and discovery.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationUser login |
Recent comments
2 weeks 1 day ago
3 weeks 1 day ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
4 weeks 3 days ago
4 weeks 4 days ago
11 weeks 6 hours ago
13 weeks 1 day ago
14 weeks 22 hours ago