Support the SiteLinks and Supporters |
e360 v FergusonORDER Granting Motion to DismissMINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall: Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal 47 is granted. Case is dismissed with prejudice. All pending deadlines and hearings are stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (kw, ) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
MOTION to DismissI guess the money for all of this litigation is starting to run low. e360 is cutting this lawsuit loose with a voluntary motion to dismiss WITH PREJUDICE (meaning that they cannot refile the case later if they change their minds).
MOTION to Sever (Wilson)This is again a bit of a document dump. Susan already has a motion to dismiss pending.
MOTION to Sever and Dismiss (Chein)This is again a bit of a document dump.
MOTION to DismissI debated how many of these documents to OCR and put up text versions of. Ultimately, I've decided to just do this one. The actual motion to dismiss merely states that it is a motion to dismiss and refers the court to this document and the affidavit. The affidavit merely restates things that you can read here. So, this one it is. =======================================
Status ReportIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited v. MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual, JOINT STATUS REPORT
MOTION to DismissIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC an Illinois Limited v. MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
ComplaintIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E360INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited MARK JAMES FERGUSON, an individual,
e360Insight LLC, et al. v. Ferguson, et al. (III) [DISMISSED]Not content to only launch a goofball suit against Comcast last week, David Linhardt, by and through e360Insight LLC, is suing Mark Ferguson, Susan Wilson, and Kelly Chien for a third time. Suit was filed on January 18, 2008. This lawsuit alleges defamation, tortious interference with a prospective business advantage, and tortious interference with a contract.
ORDER on Motion to Change VenueIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS E360 Insight v. Ferguson, et al. ORDER The matter coming to be heard on Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue, due notice having been given and the Court being advised of the premise, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Plaintiffs shall have 21 days, or until August 10, 2007, to file and serve upon the Defendant its Response to the Motion to Transfer Venue. 2. The Defendant shall have 14 days, or until August 24, 2007, to file and serve upon the Plaintiff his Reply.
|
Subscribe to SpamsuiteUpcoming DatesNavigationUser login |
Recent comments
25 weeks 2 days ago
27 weeks 4 days ago
27 weeks 4 days ago
51 weeks 2 days ago
51 weeks 2 days ago
51 weeks 3 days ago
1 year 6 weeks ago
1 year 9 weeks ago
1 year 11 weeks ago
1 year 14 weeks ago