SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
e360 v SpamhausORDER on MOTION to CompelMINUTE entry before Judge Charles P. Kocoras: Motion hearing held on 4/29/2008. Defendant's motion to compel complete discovery responses and for an extension of time to complete discovery is granted. Plaintiffs are given to 5/13/2008 to comply with discovery requests. Status hearing and the discovery cut-off date are reset from 5/6/2008 to 8/5/2008 at 9:30 a.m.
MOTION to Compel04/29/2008 - 09:30 America/Chicago Here is a Motion to Compel filed by Spamhaus. There's some interesting stuff here. 1) Mr. Linhardt blew off a deposition in January. Meaning that the deposition was properly noticed, but he just failed to show up. No reason for his non-appearance seems to have been provided. This is most definitely NOT a good thing for the judge to be finding out from e360's viewpoint.
Agreed Protective OrderIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Status hearing08/19/2008 - 09:30 America/Chicago NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, February 14, 2008:
Spamhaus' Response in Partial Opposition to Motion for Expanding Time for DiscoveryIf you don't respond to discovery in the time set, you lose the ability to object to it. That's the lesson here. ===================================== e360 INSIGHT, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, and DAVID LINHARDT, v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, a company limited by guarantee and organized under the laws of England, a/k/a THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, LTD.,
Motion for Extension of Discovery ScheduleIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E360INSIGHT, LLC, v. THE SPAMHAUS PROJECT, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY SCHEDULE
ORDER Striking AffidavitMINUTE entry before Judge Charles P. Kocoras :Status and motion hearing held on 12/5/2007. Parties' agreed motion 134 to strike ECF document No. 133 filed by William Silverstein is granted. Said document 133 is stricken.
Agreed Motion to Strike Affidavit of William SilversteinHere is the Motion to Strike the unsolicited affidavit of William Silverstein. This time, e360 doesn't even bother refuting what's in there.
Affidavit of William SilversteinHere is another unsolicited affidavit. This time from William Silverstein.
Notice of Clerk's CorrectionThis is the Clerk's form that says that the Clerk's office made a mistake even filing Ferguson's affidavit.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationUser login |
Recent comments
6 days 23 hours ago
3 weeks 1 day ago
4 weeks 15 hours ago
6 weeks 4 days ago
9 weeks 3 days ago
10 weeks 2 days ago
11 weeks 4 days ago
11 weeks 4 days ago
14 weeks 6 days ago
15 weeks 3 days ago