SpamSuite.com
A Document Repository for Spam-Related Legal Documents
SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyright Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
ORDERS on Cross Motions for Summary JudgmentThe judge in this case has ruled for Quinstreet. The determinations here were that Ferguson did qualify as an Interactive Service Provider for the purposes of CAN-SPAM, but did not suffer an "adverse effect" as contemplated by the statute. The Court also ruled that the Washington State anti-spam law is pre-empted by CAN-SPAM. Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationFerguson v. Active Response Group et al. [DISMISSED]User loginRecent comments
Syndicate |
![[file]](http://spamsuite.com/icons//pdf.gif "Download MotSJOrders.pdf"){kind=icon}
Post new comment