SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
Reply to Response to MOTION to DismissHere is Linhardt's amazing response to John Ferron's response to Linhardt's motion to dismiss. Among other amazing tidbits to be found in this document is a disavowal of his connection to BargainDepot.net (Reply at 1-2, Linhardt Affidavit at paragraph 4). Unless he's got an evil twin, then he's got problems. Possibly with perjury. Now, perjury isn't a term that I would toss around lightly. But, when you say that you aren't the head of Bargain Depot, yet you're claiming Bargain Depot as "a division of e360" (paragraph 21), calling yourself its manager and president (pages 100, 104, 152, 168, 169, and 172 of the Maui Jim documents), you're negotiating their trademark disputes as its president (pages 7, 15, and 19 of the Maui Jim 2 documents), and signing their checks and settlement agreements (pages 51, 56, and 60 of the Maui Jim documents), then you've got a wee bit of a problem with the truth. And when that comes in an affidavit, signed under oath, then it's possibly a problem with perjury. About the only out for him on this one is the "It was my evil twin brother, Skippy!" argument. Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationFerron v. e360Insight LLC, et al.User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment