SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
STIPULATION Dismissing Vision Care HoldingUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARK FERGUSON, a married v. ACTIVE RESPONSE GROUP, a New STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT: STIPULATION COME NOW Plaintiff Mark Ferguson d/b/a Whew.com, and Defendant Vision Care Holdings, LLC., through their respective counsel of record, and stipulate that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, as to all claims asserted herein against Vision Care Holdings, Inc.. Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. -2- i.Justice Law, P.C. /s/ Robert J. Siegel DATED: Oct. 22, 2007 McNAUL EBEL NAWROT & HELGREN PLLC By : /s/ Leslie J. Hagin Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationFerguson v. Active Response Group et al.User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment