SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
Ferguson v. Active Response Group et al.On July 27, 2007, Mark Ferguson, a resident of Washington State, filed suit against Active Response Group Inc., Quinstreet Inc, Nautilus, Bradford Exchange LTD, Vision Care Holding LLC. Ferguson alleges violations of the Washington Commercial Email Act, the Washington Consumer Protection Act, and the federal CAN-SPAM Act.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationFerguson v. Active Response Group et al.User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment