SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
Statement of Compliance with Local Criminal Rule 16.1IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES C. BREWER DEFENDANT JAMES C. BREWER’S STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL CRIMINAL RULE 16.1 Defendant JAMES C. BREWER, by the Federal Defender Program and its attorney, ROBERT D. SEEDER, pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 16.1 states as follows: 1. The government made delivery of its 16.1 material to defense counsel on July 17, 2007. 2. The delivery was from Assistant United States Attorney Rick Young. 3. Specifically, the government has provided various documents including the following: – - Documents Bates numbered 1-661 that contain F.B.I. reports of investigation, forensic analysis reports regarding the examinations of Mr. Brewer’s computer, as well as computers operated by the Cook County Bureau of Health Services (CCBHS), telephone records, copies of applications and affidavits requesting search warrants, as well as other miscellaneous records. 4. The government has provided what it maintains are all statements of the defendant in its possession. 5. The government has provided four discs, two of which contain “digital materials” 6. The government has agreed to duplicate the hard drive of Mr. Brewer’s computer that was confiscated in the investigation, as well as duplicate the hard drives obtained by the government from the CCBHS in its investigation, for purposes of forensic examination by an expert retained by the defense. 7. The government and Mr. Brewer have agreed that the requisite Rule 16 disclosures pertaining to the testimony of experts at trial be made no later than four weeks prior to trial. 8. The government has informed Mr. Brewer that it does not anticipate the introduction of any Rule 404(b) evidence or co-conspirator statements. However, should the government change its position on either of those matters, it would provide notice to Mr. Brewer three weeks prior to trial. Additionally, the government has agreed to produce § 3500 material three weeks prior to trial. 9. The government has informed defense counsel that it is recognizes its obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1973), and should any exculpatory evidence for the defendant become known to the government, it would immediately make it available to the defendant. 10. The government has instructed the case agent to ensure that the written notes of government agents in this case are preserved. FEDERAL DEFENDER PROGRAM BY: s Robert D. Seeder FEDERAL DEFENDER PROGRAM Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationOperation: Bot HerderUser loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment