SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
Order Requiring Timely Service and Joint Status ReportORDER REQUIRING TIMELY SERVICE AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Case No.: 2:07−CV−01623−LEW−GGH This action has been assigned to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Service of process shall be completed within one hundred twenty (120) days. 2. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order concurrently with service of process, and file with the Clerk a certificate of such service. Any party removing this action from state court shall immediately serve upon each of the other parties a copy of this Order, and file with the Clerk a certificate of such service. 3. Within 30 days after defendant answers, the parties shall confer in person about the automatic disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Thereafter, within 14 days, the parties shall submit a joint status report. The report should briefly describe the case and address: (a) Progress in serving process; 4. Upon reviewing the joint status report, the Court may: 5. Failing to obey federal or local rules, or orders of this court, may result in dismissal of this action. Even though the court will construe pro se pleadings liberally, pro se litigants must comply with the procedural rules. 6. The parties may consent to have this case before the assigned magistrate judge for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). A consent form is attached. Any party who consents should complete the form and return it to the Clerk. Unless all parties have consented, no judge will be notified that a consent form has been filed. DATE: August 9, 2007 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS by: /s/ A. Kastilahn Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Upcoming DatesNavigationThomson v. Doolittle [DISMISSED]User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment