SearchSupport the SiteOur SponsorsLinks and SupportersCopyrightExcept where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
All copyright interests in the legal filings contained herein are expressly disclaimed. Documents, opinions, and comments provided on any Spamsuite.com page are for general information purposes only and are not intended to substitute for informed professional legal advice. Spamsuite.com expressly disclaims liability for any opinion expressed in comments. Spamsuite.com does not endorse any article comment. |
Gordon, et al. v. Virtumundo, et al.On February 9, 2006, James Gordon sued Virtumundo, Adknowledge, Scott Lynn, and an unknown number of "John Doe" defendants. The lawsuit alleges that Virtumundo and Adknowledge sent mail to Mr. Gordon's domain ("gordonworks.com") in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, and at least one of the messages was "harvested" as that term is defined in the Act. It also alleges violations of Washington State's Commercial Electronic Mail Act, Washington State's Consumer Protection Act, and Washington State's Identity Crimes Act. During the course of this lawsuit, Mr. Gordon set up Omni Innovations, LLC, a limited liability company that now owns the domains. It was added as a Plaintiff in the First Amended Complaint. This is an old and extensive case with more than 300 documents as of 8 August 2007. Therefore, we will only be displaying selected documents from this case. This case is currently on appeal.
|
Upcoming Dates
NavigationGordon, et al. v. Virtumundo, et al.User loginRecent comments
|
Post new comment